Bye Paulo, sorry to see you go. So sad to see the legacy of one of the top Nonosweeper players being tainted and ruined like this. I'd be glad to see you back, should you ever happen to come to reason and apologize to every single person in this community you wronged.
You bringing up Minesweeper again shows once again that you're blind with hatred and/or have absolutely no idea what you are talking about. Once again: You really don't do yourself any favours, bringing in Cubing or especially Minesweeper into this. I've gotten a 12 on Int and a 42 on Exp at the 2011 Minesweeper World Championship in Zurich. There was absolutely zero possibility of cheating, using computers in the ETH computer lab and with the other participants sitting around me. The 42 was at that time the world record on Exp for times achieved at tournament. Again: That was the fastest time in the world that was undeniably achieved under circumstances were no cheating at all was possible. As always, you were just throwing dirt, hoping that eventually something would stick. If you only just once did your research first instead of posting this baseless nonsense. All of my Minesweeper records can be found on minesweeper.info in my profile. I dare say my improvement from barely sub100 on exp to once #3 of the world is better documented than that of any other sweeper with by far the most submitted improvements. Besides this, there is my personal archive containing videos of over 99.9& of my finished games, including over 70 sub40s and over 6000 sub50s. Don't forget the youtube videos, contributions to Minesweeper Arbiter, high score verification for the minesweeper.info rankings, discovery of the randomisation seeding bug that affected not only Nonosweeper but was initially found by me in Minesweeper Clone and my article about lucky beginner games, which resulted in the rules for rankings being adapted that beginner games must include at leats one non-random click.
tl;dr: don't bring up Minesweeper against the most legitimate player of that game, if you don't know your facts.
"How skilled is EWQM?"
Better than you on genius, that's for sure. We'll see what happens on Expert, after you're banned and I can play Expert again instead of dealing with this nonsense. (@rest: excuse my smugness here
)
"Finally, just to say a few words about my times.
I know you think that i speed up too. But you are wrong. I hereby claim the following:
I have never speeded up my standard levels times (minesweeper and nonosweeper) by whatever means possible."
Either your reading comprehension is severely lacking or it's intentional neglience. You were never accused of cheating. It was merely noted that among the top players you and Luca Vezzoni (although he retired too early for me to really know much about him) are the only ones who have never backed up their times the way others have, be it by showing up in person to a tournament or showing a video that goes beyond screen capture. Your Minesweeper times are irrelevant here and I'll do my best to make your Exp times on Nono a bit less relevant.
tl;dr: Still less evidence than Stephan, Lutz and I have brought forward, yet there's no accusations of cheating against you. Just huge dissapointment.
"Again, what was the nono version you managed to get the 38, 78 and 100?"
Uhm, how about you answer the countless questions first that you were asked but evaded so far? Guess it's too late for that now. So anyways: Probably the version that was in use before the most recent one. Shouldn't be that difficult to figure out for you, you smart investigator of Nonosweeper records.
"Now youre more quiet than a dead body. You are just waiting for my ban!"
Exactly. With Yariv and Stephan involved there is no need for me to rush to a reply.
@yariv: Thank you!
Home
Pages: 1
New personal records vol. 2 (Read 125445 times)
